Chris Tann, the only "believer in god" who responded, is an idiot. Check out his other thread, seriously. Cofty's description is accurate.
CrazyGuy used to be like you on here actually. I'll admit his threads frustrated the hell out of myself a some others here on the board for a while.
He came to a more accurate view in his own time, just as you might.
You need to understand, though that what you are attempting to do here is a waste of time. The bible is not scientifically accurate just because some believers can cherry pick a verse and shape it's "meaning" to fit modern science. This involves a huge amount of ignorance and is actually quite dishonest.
I'm not a scientologist, far from it but if one or two parts of Dianetics can be interpreted as scientifically accurate, does that make the entirety of Dianetics scientifically accurate and true? No. It's the same with the bible. So much is contradictory to facts, that there's really no point in trying to prove it as scientifically accurate.